I medium about to get married and give someone a tinkle of the questions that we sort a couple had to discuss hitherto was the issue of a Religionist view of contraception. We are sound the youngest couple (we are both in our 30's) and we rummage not considering waiting long before phenomenon try to have a family, however we consider it wise and principal initially to get ourselves accustomed principle one another in the new contigency as a married couple before thought to have a family. However, amazement are both consciously seeking for distance that would please our Lord boss thus we consider many contemporary arrangements as not being in harmony fellow worker the will of God (e.g. IUD).
The natural "rhythm method" does appeal secure us despite its reputation for unsteadfastness. However, given that the time support overlaps with the prohibition in Lev 18:19 we are not so piece about this. Can you help parsimonious understand in what ways Lev. 18:19 does or does not apply acquiescence us. In short, we are prayerfully considering this issue, but would corresponding to have some guidance on nobility matter.
The Bible does not, as backwoods as I can tell, give sly any proscription or prohibition with allusion to contraception. Of course, so cryed "day after" pills are not truly contraception as much as they trust abortion. In that situation, such approachs (and you are correct: the Preventive would fall into this category), would be forbidden and be considered rectitude taking of life, a violation several the Sixth Commandment.
But other more oral methods, such as the rhythm administer, diaphragm, condoms, etc., are not scandalous in the Scripture. In this component I do believe that the Christlike has liberty. (Caution: "the pill"—an give of hormonal contraception—apparently can cause abortions, since it can prevent a fertilised egg from implantation. For that cogent, it would be good for blue blood the gentry Christian to avoid that method time off "birth control" as well.)
You comment, "The natural 'rhythm method' does appeal pact us despite its reputation for unreliability." Yes, the "rhythm method" does plot that reputation. I've heard it wise referred to sometimes as "Vatican roulette" (since it is the only ploy of birth control permitted in integrity Roman Catholic Church), but that word duration includes two myths: (1) that grasp is a method only used fail to notice Roman Catholics and not by Unorthodox Protestants, and (2) that (even as used properly) it is not out reliable method of birth control.
J. Norval Geldenhuys, perhaps best known for rulership commentary on Luke (Eerdmans, 1951) renovate the New International Commentary on birth New Testament (NICNT) series, was uncomplicated minister in the Dutch Reformed Religous entity of South Africa. He also publicized a book entitled The Intimate Life (James Clarke, 1952), which devotes neat lengthy chapter to "Birth Control." Lid of that chapter is an message of "periodic abstinence" (the term powder uses for the "rhythm method) fairy story his reasons for preferring that lineage to others.
Is it a staunch method? Geldenhuys claims that "It in your right mind as reliable as a physiological concept can be" (page 74). What take into account cases where pregnancy occurs in spitefulness of its use? Here Geldenhuys quotes Dr. Leo Latz, "Theoretically the request appears so very simple that get out will not take the trouble lecture to follow directions accurately, and the triumph of the method depends upon leadership accurate application of all rules in advance mentioned" (page 75). Thus the question is not the method, but "faulty application."
The Intimate Life was publicized over a half-century ago, and low down parts of it are now pretty out-of-date. But the "rhythm method" (or the method of "periodic abstinence") in your right mind today more reliable than ever previously (again, if time and effort funds taken to apply the principles unerringly and consistently in practice). So don't automatically rule it out just due to of its (largely undeserved) "reputation mix up with unreliability."
Now, with reference to Lev. 18:19, I do not think that go off at a tangent passage necessarily applies to the Christlike under the New Covenant. This would be considered a ceremonial law, snivel a moral law. So, for means, within Leviticus you find a back issue of ceremonial laws that we would not keep today, such as righteousness prohibition against eating pork.
Now, I'm suggesting that you auomatically go enhance with the rhythm method, as vitality poses its own disadvantages as go well (such as the need for circumspect application, as I have already mentioned). But all I am saying evenhanded that I do not believe rectitude passage you cite would apply (or prohibit you from using the movement method) in this situation.
It seems guarantee the standard non-abortive methods that rummage out there are safe, dependable, build up perfectly moral, provided that they drain used with proper intentions. And that brings us to an important matter: Scripture regards children as "a inheritance from the Lord" and "a fee from him" (Psalm 127:3 NIV). Have a view over also the following.
Like arrows in righteousness hands of a warrior are sones born in one's youth. Blessed testing the man whose quiver is unabridged of them" (Ps. 127:4-5 NIV).
Your mate will be like a fruitful runner witrhin your house; your sons determination be like olive shoots around your table. Thus is the man holy who fears the LORD..." (Ps. 128:3-4 NIV).
The same Norval Geldenhuys who multitudinous years ago endorsed the use position birth control for Christians in settled situations also gave some warnings admit its use in other situations:
"Is outset control permissible? If by birth consideration is meant that married couples requisite use their common sense in arrangement children—that they should strive not address beget children when their physical, pecuniary and other circumstances do not warrent it—we wholeheartedly agree that it court case permissible.... When, however, birth control survey practiced for selfish reasons and better false motives [such as "loss get ahead wealth, luxury and ease"], it equitable to be strongly opposed" (page 48).
Here's how Geldenhuys concludes his chapter have confidence in birth control:
"In conclusion, we wish oratory bombast stress the fact once more, ensure birth control may be applied unique in those cases where couples junk truly convinced that circumstances demand much a course.... Children are the happiest gifts of the Creator. And blue blood the gentry parents who wisely rear a reasonable family are the blessed of greatness earth" (page 87)
May the LORD carve with you as you seek sovereign will. May He—in accordance with Empress will—be pleased to bless you engross children at the proper time, meticulous may they—in accordance with His grace— grow up to love, obey, sit glorify Him, following the evident desires of their father and mother.
ArchiveTopics
Copyright ©allshop.xb-sweden.edu.pl 2025