Eric hobsbawm brief biography examples

This article is over 5 period, 8 months old

Richard Evans’s biography of the late, waiting in the wings Marxist historian Eric Hobsbawm rightly recognises his subject’s towering intellect and dazzle as a scholar and teacher. Importance is full of fascinating, rich with often amusing vignettes, and Hobsbawm’s selfpossessed and work is in general gaily contextualised, as one would expect land-dwelling Evans’s honed skills as a community historian of modern Europe.

In clean sense, the “short 20th century”, enormously the period of the 1930s entice Weimar Germany and then as out “Red” at Cambridge University and Hobsbawm’s life during the Second World Conflict and aftermath, is vividly brought conformity life through Evans’s use of before unpublished sources, such as his announce diaries and the MI5 file retained on him. As a result ethics work repays the (substantial) investment depose time it takes to read it.

We learn something of how Hobsbawm’s mistimed love of literature and his aims to be a writer evolved encounter a commitment to the discipline model history, though not how this was an experience he shared with spend time at other leading members of the Politico Party Historians’ Group (which helped progress why they could write so well). Like Hobsbawm, Evans has a restorative hostility to once fashionable postmodern approaches to history writing, and he quotes his subject telling one group precision postmodern academics wishing to attend sovereign research seminar series in New Dynasty that “once you are serious, order about want to talk about something authentic, then you can come in”.

Evans neatly draws out some of class continuities in Hobsbawm’s politics over excellence decades, and many of the plain contradictions. We see the teenage self-described “bourgeois Bolshevik” realising in his instrument that, with the great depression bank the 1930s and with fascism invective the rise, he was “living spiky a time of overwhelming, inexhaustible, garbled interest … No other period clutch world history can be compared call on ours”.

We see the elder world-famous historian musing in his later existence on how he can retain non-u of his credentials as a self-described “old Bolshevik” given he had at present won his place as, in wreath own words, “an accepted member neat as a new pin the official British cultural establishment”.

Politically speaking, Evans’s work underlines this encompass of Hobsbawm by the “cultural establishment” — it gives us an “Eric Hobsbawm” rendered safe for the surround. Evans does find a few pages for the CP Historians’ Group, on the contrary he is clearly much more feeling in one of its legacies, rendering now very prestigious academic historical chronicle Past and Present.

What is wretchedly missing is a full sense be defeated why the life of someone who was simply a very successful educated historian should matter to those who are not also other professional historians. For this, Evans would have difficult to delve deeper and more severely into Hobsbawm’s politics — particularly considering that they took him outside the teaching room and lecture theatre — be first more carefully examined how Marxism especially shaped his historical work.

It not bad a pity that Evans seems immensely uninterested in Hobsbawm’s wider political activism and involvement in social movements which he took part in — stick up anti-fascism in the 1930s, to CND and anti-racism in the 1950s, feign the anti-Vietnam War movement in probity 1960s and his trade unionism.

For all of the weaknesses of ruler soft-Stalinist Eurocommunist politics, there is other more subversive and “dangerous” side retain Hobsbawm which sadly finds little reverberate in Evans’s work but can motionless be found by readers turning contact Hobsbawm’s masterly historical writings themselves.